EN 16931 rules › BR-CO-03
BR-CO-03 — Value added tax point date (BT-7) and Value added tax point date code (BT-8) are mutually exclusive
| Rule id | BR-CO-03 |
|---|---|
| Rule set | EN 16931 itself, not a national or network addition |
| Severity | fatal in CII and UBL — a validator enforcing this rule set rejects the invoice |
| Applies to | the CII and UBL syntaxes |
| Checked by | the validator on this site and invoicekit.go v0.2.11, the library behind it |
The rule as published
Value added tax point date (BT-7) and Value added tax point date code (BT-8) are mutually exclusive.
fatal in CII and UBL — a validator enforcing this rule set rejects the invoice.
What runs for it
Straight from the artefacts the engine embeds: the node the assertion selects and the test it applies there. A failing invoice is reported with the message above.
| Syntax | Severity | Artefact phase | Applied to | Fails when |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CII | fatal | EN16931-model-phase | //ram:ApplicableHeaderTradeSettlement/ram:ApplicableTradeTax | ((//ram:TaxPointDate) and not(//ram:DueDateTypeCode)) or (not (//ram:TaxPointDate) and (//ram:DueDateTypeCode)) or (not (//ram:TaxPointDate) and not (//ram:DueDateTypeCode)) |
| UBL | fatal | EN16931model_phase | /ubl:Invoice | /cn:CreditNote | (exists(cbc:TaxPointDate) and not(cac:InvoicePeriod/cbc:DescriptionCode)) or (not(cbc:TaxPointDate) and exists(cac:InvoicePeriod/cbc:DescriptionCode)) or (not(cbc:TaxPointDate) and not(cac:InvoicePeriod/cbc:DescriptionCode)) |
Data elements it names
- BT-7 Value added tax point date (cited by 1 rule)
- BT-8 Value added tax point date code (cited by 1 rule)
See also
- Every EN 16931 rule id — the same list as a filterable table, with the assertions as CSV and JSON.
- What XRechnung and Peppol BIS add — rule sets that run these ids plus their own.
- The data elements — every BT and BG with the rules that name it.